S01-BATCH-02 Market Foundation Todos: Batch 2/8 Discussion
This article delves into the specifics of batch 2/8 of the S01-BATCH-02 Stage-01_Market-Foundation.todos, providing a comprehensive overview of the tasks, execution requirements, and deliverables. This discussion category focuses on azzon and story4, offering additional context for the tasks at hand. Let's dive into the details and explore the intricacies of this batch.
📋 Task Overview
At the heart of this batch lies the meticulous execution of several critical tasks, each designed to contribute to the overall market foundation strategy. Understanding the task overview is the first step in ensuring successful completion. The key elements of the task overview include:
- File:
todo/Stage-01_Market-Foundation.todos.md - Task ID:
S01-BATCH-02 - Number of TODOs: 5
The specified file serves as the central repository for task details, while the Task ID provides a unique identifier for this particular batch. The number of TODOs indicates the workload and scope of the batch, setting the stage for effective planning and execution. Understanding these fundamental aspects is crucial for maintaining focus and efficiency throughout the process. This structured approach ensures that each task is addressed with the appropriate level of attention and resources.
🎯 Execution Requirements
The execution requirements for this batch are clearly defined and must be adhered to meticulously. Following the Unified Automated Pipeline (The Unified Loop), as outlined in .github/copilot-instructions.md, is paramount. This pipeline consists of several key steps, each designed to ensure thoroughness and quality. These steps are:
1. Scan
The initial step involves a comprehensive scan of the relevant materials. This includes:
- 📁 Reading the file:
todo/Stage-01_Market-Foundation.todos.md - 🔍 Locating the specified TODO items
- 📖 Reviewing the task details and metadata provided below
Scanning ensures that all team members are aligned with the objectives and requirements of the batch. This foundational step sets the stage for informed decision-making and efficient task execution. Without a thorough scan, the risk of misinterpretation and oversight increases significantly.
2. Expert Council & Think
This phase emphasizes collaborative brainstorming and critical thinking. It involves:
- 👥 Assembling a 3-person expert panel (Principal + Business Advisor + Risk Control)
- 🔎 Retrieving relevant files (e.g., Project-Bible.md)
- ⚠️ Conducting conflict checks: Do new ideas contradict existing settings?
- 💰 Evaluating value: Does it align with the North Star indicators?
- 🔬 Deeply exploring: Uncovering all possible branches and details
The expert council ensures that diverse perspectives are considered, and potential pitfalls are identified early on. This collaborative approach fosters innovation and mitigates risks. By engaging in thorough discussions and evaluations, the team can make well-informed decisions that align with the project's overall goals.
3. Plan
The planning phase is crucial for organizing the execution of tasks. Key activities include:
- 📂 Determining the output path:
archives/Stage-01_*/{Filename}.md - 📋 Identifying dependent files
- 🔄 Determining if Project-Bible.md needs updating
Effective planning streamlines the workflow and ensures that resources are allocated efficiently. A well-defined plan minimizes confusion and facilitates seamless execution. By identifying dependencies and potential updates, the team can proactively address challenges and maintain project coherence.
4. Produce (Draft)
The production phase involves creating the actual deliverables. The requirements for this phase are stringent:
- ✍️ Outputting detailed and complete content, with no omissions
- 🚫 Adhering to the anti-AI flavor agreement (avoiding phrases like "however," "obviously," "at this moment," etc.)
- ✅ Using Show-Don't-Tell and enforcing short sentences
- 🎣 Checking for business hooks every 2000 words
Producing high-quality content requires a commitment to clarity, conciseness, and engagement. By focusing on concrete examples and avoiding generic phrases, the team can create compelling narratives that resonate with the audience. Regularly checking for business hooks ensures that the content remains commercially viable.
5. Quality Control (Verify)
Quality control is a critical step in ensuring that the deliverables meet the required standards. This involves:
- 🔍 Self-review: Does it meet the acceptance criteria?
- 🤔 Evaluating: Does it read like it was written by a human expert?
- 🔁 Redoing immediately if unsatisfied; do not consult the user
Rigorous self-assessment is essential for maintaining high standards. By critically evaluating their work, team members can identify areas for improvement and ensure that the final product is of the highest quality. The emphasis on human-like writing underscores the importance of authenticity and engagement.
6. Archive (Commit)
The final step in the pipeline is archiving the completed work. This includes:
- 💾 Saving the file to the specified path
- 📝 Updating
Project-Bible.mdif there are new settings/foreshadowing/characters - ⚠️ Updating
Risk-Ledger.mdif there are unresolved issues - ✅ Checking the TODO: changing
- [ ]to- [x]
Archiving ensures that all work is properly documented and accessible for future reference. By updating relevant files, the team maintains a comprehensive record of project decisions and progress. This meticulous approach fosters transparency and accountability.
⚠️ Absolute Hard Constraints
Several absolute constraints govern the execution of this batch. These constraints are non-negotiable and must be strictly adhered to. They include:
- Atomic Execution: Each TODO must be completed independently, with no batch selections allowed.
- Closed-Loop Delivery: Substantive outputs are required; omissions and placeholders are prohibited.
- In-Depth Thinking: Superficial work is unacceptable; maximize AI computation.
- Mandatory Chinese: All outputs must be in Simplified Chinese.
These constraints ensure that the work is thorough, complete, and aligned with project requirements. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for maintaining quality and consistency.
📦 Delivery Standards
The delivery standards outline the criteria for successful task completion. These standards include:
- [ ] TODO has been checked (modify
todo/Stage-01_Market-Foundation.todos.md) - [ ] Output has been archived (saved to the
archives/directory) - [ ] Settings have been updated (synchronized to Project-Bible.md)
- [ ] PR contains a self-inspection checklist
- [ ] PR description includes
Fixes #{issue_number}
Meeting these standards ensures that all deliverables are complete and properly documented. Each criterion serves as a checkpoint, verifying that the task has been executed to the required specifications.
📚 Reference Files
Several reference files provide essential context and guidance for completing the tasks. These files include:
.github/copilot-instructions.mdtodo/Stage-01_Market-Foundation.todos.mdStages/Stage-01_*.mdProject-Bible.md(will be created automatically if it does not exist)Risk-Ledger.md(will be created automatically if it does not exist)
Consulting these files ensures that team members have access to the information they need to make informed decisions. These resources provide a framework for understanding project goals, requirements, and constraints.
💡 Tips
Several tips can help optimize the execution of this batch. These include:
- For non-blocking issues, make decisions based on the setting library and record logs.
- Each TODO is an independent creative act, requiring a complete six-step cycle.
- Do not be stingy with Tokens; be as detailed as possible during the #think and #draft phases.
Following these tips can enhance efficiency and creativity. Proactive problem-solving and comprehensive documentation are key to successful task completion.
📋 Task Details
The task details provide specific instructions for each TODO item. These details include the task description, required output, and acceptance criteria. Understanding these details is crucial for producing high-quality deliverables. The tasks include:
S01-MA-006 Competitive Product Selection (Benchmark 4)
- Responsible Experts: MA (Market Analysis) + CA (Chief Architect)
- Task Description: Select the 4th benchmark work from the TOP50 for in-depth analysis.
- Output Requirements:
- Book title, author, word count, update frequency, completion status
- Core selling points (summarized in one sentence)
- Opening hook analysis (sources of attraction in the first 3 chapters)
- Subscription curve characteristics (if public data is available)
- Summary of success factors (at least 3 points)
- Learnable points and differentiation space
- Output to the "Competitive Product Matrix" section of
archives/Stage-01_Market-Foundation/Market-Analysis-Report.md
- Acceptance Criteria: The depth of analysis should be no less than 1500 words, including specific examples.
This task requires a thorough analysis of a benchmark product, focusing on its key features and success factors. The detailed output requirements ensure that the analysis is comprehensive and insightful. The 1500-word minimum length encourages in-depth exploration and critical evaluation.
S01-MA-007 Competitive Product Selection (Benchmark 5)
- Responsible Experts: MA (Market Analysis) + CA (Chief Architect)
- Task Description: Select the 5th benchmark work from the TOP50 for in-depth analysis.
- Output Requirements:
- Book title, author, word count, update frequency, completion status
- Core selling points (summarized in one sentence)
- Opening hook analysis (sources of attraction in the first 3 chapters)
- Subscription curve characteristics (if public data is available)
- Summary of success factors (at least 3 points)
- Learnable points and differentiation space
- Output to the "Competitive Product Matrix" section of
archives/Stage-01_Market-Foundation/Market-Analysis-Report.md
- Acceptance Criteria: The depth of analysis should be no less than 1500 words, including specific examples.
Similar to the previous task, this involves a detailed analysis of another benchmark product. The consistent requirements ensure uniformity and comparability across analyses. By identifying learnable points and differentiation space, the team can gain valuable insights for future projects.
S01-MA-008 Market Opportunity Gap Analysis
- Responsible Experts: MA (Market Analysis) + MS (Marketing Expert)
- Task Description: Based on the analysis of 5 benchmark works, identify "unmet needs" in the market.
- Output Requirements:
- List 3 "oversaturated" elements in the current market (e.g., infinite flow, system flow are rampant)
- Identify 3 "undersupplied" niche directions (e.g., a certain historical background is rarely written)
- Propose 3 "innovative combination" opportunities (e.g., fusion of A type + B type)
- Add to
archives/Stage-01_Market-Foundation/Market-Analysis-Report.md
- Acceptance Criteria: Each opportunity gap needs to be supported by data or case evidence.
This task focuses on identifying market opportunities by analyzing oversaturated and undersupplied areas. The emphasis on data-driven insights ensures that the proposed opportunities are grounded in reality. By exploring innovative combinations, the team can uncover novel market segments.
S01-PM-009 Platform Rules and Content Taboo Compilation
- Responsible Experts: PM (Project Manager) + QA (Quality Assurance Editor)
- Task Description: Compile content review rules and red lines for each platform.
- Output Requirements:
- Political sensitivity content red lines (historical nihilism, political satire, etc.)
- Pornographic violence boundaries (allowed scale, prohibited descriptions)
- Other taboos (religion, ethnicity, superstition, etc.)
- Platform-specific rules (e.g., Tomato prohibits certain topics)
- Add to the "Compliance Risks" section of
Risk-Ledger.md(create the file if it does not exist)
- Acceptance Criteria: Include at least 15 specific taboos, with sources (official rules/cases) noted.
This task addresses the critical aspect of compliance by identifying content taboos and platform-specific rules. The detailed output requirements ensure that the compilation is comprehensive and reliable. By documenting the sources, the team can maintain transparency and accountability.
S01-CA-010 Creative Direction A - Category Selection
- Responsible Experts: CA (Chief Architect) + MA (Market Analysis)
- Task Description: Based on market analysis, select a category/theme for Creative Direction A.
- Output Requirements:
- Determine category (e.g., Eastern Fantasy, Urban Abilities, Historical Fiction, Interstellar Science Fiction, etc.)
- Explain the reasons for the selection (market capacity, competition intensity, personal advantages)
- Output to the "Plan A" section of
archives/Stage-01_Market-Foundation/Creative-Concepts.md
- Acceptance Criteria: The selection reasons should be no less than 300 words and include data support.
This task involves selecting a creative direction based on market analysis and strategic considerations. The requirement for data-supported reasoning ensures that the selection is well-justified. By considering market capacity, competition intensity, and personal advantages, the team can make an informed decision.
In conclusion, S01-BATCH-02 Stage-01_Market-Foundation.todos batch 2/8 encompasses a series of critical tasks designed to lay a strong market foundation. By adhering to the execution requirements, delivery standards, and absolute constraints, the team can ensure the successful completion of these tasks. For further insights into market analysis and strategic planning, consider exploring resources like HubSpot's Marketing Resources.