.NET 10: Blazor Two-Way Binding Breaks In Tests
Two-way binding is a cornerstone of Blazor's component interaction, allowing for seamless synchronization between parent and child components. However, a significant issue has emerged in .NET 10 that disrupts this harmony, particularly within the realm of component testing. This article delves into the bug, its impact, and potential workarounds, providing a comprehensive guide for developers navigating this challenge.
The Bug: Two-Way Binding Synchronization Failure
The core problem lies in the behavior of bUnit's SetParametersAndRender method within .NET 10. In previous versions, this method effectively maintained two-way binding synchronization between a child component's parameter and the parent component's bound field. However, in .NET 10, this synchronization breaks down. When SetParametersAndRender is used to set a parameter on a child component, the parent's corresponding bound field is not updated, leading to a discrepancy between the two.
This issue manifests as an undocumented breaking change that can severely impact Blazor component testing, especially when relying on two-way binding. Developers who have upgraded to .NET 10 may find their tests failing unexpectedly due to this synchronization problem.
Expected Behavior vs. Actual Behavior
To illustrate the issue, consider a scenario with a simple Blazor component containing a MudSwitch control bound to a private field _focused in the parent component:
<MudSwitch @bind-Value="@_focused" />
@code {
private bool _focused;
}
In a testing scenario, the expectation is that using SetParametersAndRender to set the Value parameter of the MudSwitch to true should also update the parent component's _focused field to true. This is the behavior observed in .NET 9 and earlier.
var @switch = comp.FindComponent<MudSwitch<bool>>();
@switch.SetParametersAndRender(parameter => parameter.Add(x => x.Value, true));
// Expected: The parent component's _focused field should be synchronized with the switch's Value
// parameter (both should be true).
However, in .NET 10, the actual behavior deviates significantly. While SetParametersAndRender does set the Value parameter of the MudSwitch to true, it fails to update the parent's _focused field. This breaks the two-way binding contract, leading to inconsistent state between the components.
var @switch = comp.FindComponent<MudSwitch<bool>>();
@switch.SetParametersAndRender(parameter => parameter.Add(x => x.Value, true));
// Switch Value = true, but parent's _focused = false !! Broken sync!
Steps to Reproduce the Bug
To further understand and verify this issue, here's a step-by-step guide to reproduce the bug:
-
Create a Test Component with Two-Way Binding:
Start by creating a Blazor component (
SelectTest1.razor) that utilizes two-way binding. This component should include elements that demonstrate the binding issue, such as aMudSelectand aMudSwitch:<MudSelect @bind-Value="_value" OnBlur="Blurred"> <MudSelectItem Value="@("1")"/> </MudSelect> <MudSwitch @bind-Value="@_focused" /> @code { private string? _value = null; private bool _focused; private void Blurred() { _focused = false; } } -
Write a bUnit Test:
Next, create a bUnit test that interacts with the component and attempts to manipulate the bound values. This test should use
SetParametersAndRenderto set theValueparameter of theMudSwitch:var comp = Context.RenderComponent<SelectTest1>(); var @switch = comp.FindComponent<MudSwitch<bool>>(); // Use bUnit's recommended approach: @switch.SetParametersAndRender(parameter => parameter.Add(x => x.Value, true)); // Trigger parent to set _focused = false await comp.InvokeAsync(() => select.Instance.OnBlurAsync(new FocusEventArgs())); // Expected: switch should be false (synchronized with parent's _focused) // Actual in .NET 10: switch is still true (binding broken) comp.WaitForAssertion(() => @switch.Instance.Value.Should().Be(false)); -
Run the Test on .NET 9:
Execute the test in a .NET 9 environment. You should observe that the test passes, indicating that the two-way binding is correctly maintained.
-
Run the Test on .NET 10:
Now, run the same test in a .NET 10 environment. This time, the test will fail, demonstrating the broken two-way binding synchronization. The
MudSwitchwill retain itstruevalue, while the parent's_focusedfield will befalse.
Workarounds and Solutions
While the bug in .NET 10 presents a challenge, there are workarounds that can help maintain two-way binding functionality in your tests. One effective approach involves using the EventCallback associated with the bound parameter.
Using EventCallback for Synchronization
Instead of directly setting the parameter using SetParametersAndRender, you can invoke the ValueChanged event callback to ensure proper synchronization. This method more closely mimics the actual behavior of Blazor's two-way binding mechanism.
// Workaround that works:
await comp.InvokeAsync(() => @switch.Instance.ValueChanged.InvokeAsync(true));
// Both switch Value = true AND parent's _focused = true ✅
This workaround suggests that only the EventCallback approach maintains the two-way binding contract in .NET 10. By invoking the ValueChanged event, you trigger the necessary updates in the parent component, ensuring that the bound field is synchronized with the child component's parameter.
Impact and Implications
The broken two-way binding synchronization in .NET 10 has significant implications for Blazor development and testing:
- Test Failures: Existing tests that rely on two-way binding may fail unexpectedly after upgrading to .NET 10.
- Increased Testing Complexity: Developers may need to adopt new testing strategies and workarounds to ensure accurate component behavior.
- Potential for Bugs: The lack of synchronization can lead to subtle bugs in the application if not properly addressed.
Conclusion
The two-way binding issue in .NET 10 is a critical bug that can impact Blazor component testing. Understanding the problem and implementing the suggested workarounds is essential for maintaining the integrity of your tests and applications. By using the EventCallback approach, developers can effectively mitigate the synchronization issues and ensure that two-way binding functions as expected.
It's also recommended to stay informed about updates and fixes from the .NET team regarding this issue. Keep an eye on the official .NET documentation and community forums for the latest information. For more in-depth information on Blazor and .NET development, consider exploring resources like Microsoft's official .NET documentation.